00:00
UPractice

Reading Comprehension Practice 74

Maximilien Robespierre, one of the most controversial figures of the French Revolution, played a pivotal role in its development, embodying both its highest ideals and its darkest excesses. Known as "The Incorruptible" for his unwavering dedication to revolutionary principles, Robespierre remains a symbol of the complexities and contradictions of revolutionary leadership. His contributions to liberty, equality, and the abolition of monarchy were groundbreaking, but his reliance on terror to achieve these goals continues to provoke debate among historians.

Born in Arras, France, in 1758, Robespierre was a bright and diligent student who excelled in his studies, eventually becoming a lawyer. His early career was marked by a commitment to justice and the rights of ordinary citizens, themes that would define his later political career. As the French Revolution began in 1789, Robespierre emerged as a leading voice in the National Assembly, advocating for the abolition of the monarchy and the establishment of a republic. Inspired by Enlightenment thinkers such as Rousseau, he championed the ideas of liberty, equality, and fraternity, which became the rallying cries of the Revolution.

Robespierre’s influence grew as the Revolution progressed and became more radical. By 1793, the monarchy had been abolished, King Louis XVI had been executed, and France faced threats from both internal counter-revolutionaries and external enemies. To safeguard the Revolution, Robespierre joined the Committee of Public Safety, a powerful governing body tasked with protecting the republic at all costs. It was during this period that Robespierre’s leadership reached its zenith—and sparked its greatest controversies.

The Committee of Public Safety oversaw the Reign of Terror, a period of intense political purges aimed at eliminating perceived enemies of the Revolution. Thousands of people, including nobles, clergy, and even former allies, were executed by guillotine. Robespierre justified the use of terror as a necessary tool to protect the Revolution and build a virtuous society. "Terror is nothing other than swift, severe, and inflexible justice," he argued, linking the idea of virtue to the ruthless pursuit of revolutionary goals. To Robespierre, the ends justified the means, even when those means involved widespread violence.

While the Reign of Terror temporarily stabilized the revolutionary government, it also created widespread fear and distrust. Robespierre’s determination to root out enemies alienated even his closest supporters. Many questioned whether his vision of a virtuous society was achievable—or whether it was worth the cost in human lives. By mid-1794, opposition to Robespierre had grown within the National Convention, the governing assembly of France. Accused of tyranny and threatening the unity of the Revolution, Robespierre was arrested on July 27, 1794, and executed the following day. His death marked the end of the Reign of Terror and a turning point in the Revolution.

Robespierre’s legacy is as divisive as his life. Supporters view him as a principled leader who sought to create a more just and equal society in the face of immense challenges. They credit him with advancing significant reforms, such as abolishing slavery in French colonies and advocating for universal male suffrage. Critics, however, focus on his role in the Reign of Terror, portraying him as a fanatic whose rigid ideology led to unnecessary bloodshed. His life serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of absolute power and the moral dilemmas of revolutionary leadership.

The story of Robespierre is inseparable from the broader narrative of the French Revolution. His actions highlight the tension between idealism and pragmatism, justice and vengeance, freedom and control. The Revolution itself was a complex and turbulent period that reshaped France and inspired movements for democracy and equality worldwide. Robespierre’s life, with all its contradictions, embodies the triumphs and tragedies of that era.

In modern times, Robespierre’s ideas continue to spark discussion about the nature of governance and the limits of power. How far should leaders go to achieve their ideals? Can virtue coexist with violence? These are questions that remain relevant as societies grapple with issues of justice, freedom, and the common good. Robespierre’s story reminds us that the pursuit of progress often comes with profound ethical challenges, making him a figure whose impact resonates far beyond the French Revolution.

1. What is the main idea of the passage?





2. Why was Robespierre called 'The Incorruptible'?





3. What role did the Committee of Public Safety play during the Revolution?





4. What reforms is Robespierre credited with advancing?





5. What does the passage suggest about the impact of the Reign of Terror?





6. Why did Robespierre justify the use of terror during the Revolution?





7. What can be inferred about Robespierre’s downfall?





8. What does the word 'virtue' most likely mean in the context of Robespierre’s policies?





9. How does the author organize the passage?





10. What broader lesson does Robespierre’s story convey about power and governance?





Results: